Democrats Want Canadians Dead

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fT8pOXSYl7s
We have all seen the clip of Ed Shultz tirade that Republicans want to see Americans dead. Since the cable channel that shows the picture of Earth from space gets better ratings, I took the liberty of posting the link here thanks to YouTube. Unfortunately, I think Media Matters put it there and I should give them attribution. (your welcome, George).
First, I have a suggestion to Ed Shultz. Just because you have one anecdotal story to tell about an anonynus person and you yell it. It doesn't make your argument any more convincing. I am going to try your tactic without yelling. There's this guy who lives in Oregon who had diabetes and in order to save his life they had to cut off half his foot. He walked into a hospital and within hours was treated and within a week had the operation. He didn't have insurance, but set up a payment plan with the hospital and agreed to pay the bill because he was alive.
See how easy that is? This story I am sure without doing too much research is common. A man has a heart attack in this country, within minutes EMT's show up and take him to the hospital and treat him without asking if he has insurance. God this is fun! OK, Enough of that. Here is a link to an article that is factual...Did you see that word Ed? FACTUAL!
http://freep.com/article/20090820/BUSINESS06/908200420/1319/

See, not only do we have the greatest health care in the world, but we also supplement Canada's health care system. Without our fantastic health care system there would be less Canadians. The Canadian government is denying (rationing) coverage to their citizens. If we nationalize health care, we will not be able to treat 11 million more Americans with less doctors and the Canadians. So with Democrats pushing this so hard, my only conclusion is that they want to see Canadians dead. They (the Democrat lead government) could make more money with more Canadian corpses then to just leave the whole thing alone and we can continue to be the best health care in the world.
Even someone with an IQ under 100, like Ed, could see that this has to be the case. So much for being a global citizen. If we are to be global citizens, shouldn't we have compassion for our neighbors to the north? Or is this just another case of hypocrisy from the left? We can have amnesty for 10 million illegal aliens(did I just say that, yes I did), but not maintain our current policy of helping anyone who comes through the doors of our hospitals.

jb

Well This Clears Up Nothing

Well the libs are rolling out their clean up hitter President Carter to clear up the debate over health care. You can watch the video thanks to Realclear politics.com: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/09/15/carter_claims_there_is_racist_tone_against_obama.htmlalthcare.

Since there is a lot of demands for apologies these days I would like one from President Carter for calling me a racist. The Political ads in this part of the country played up his white heritage. There was no mention that he was African-American. (Well except the visual one). So I am declaring victory for the defeat of Nationalize Health care because my rules of engagement for argument is the first one to name call loses. That's it. That's the best the proponents of this liberty stealing, tax increasing, power grab of legislation can do. (No mention of Obama's race in any of the negatives that I just laid out). When you hear the word Government in any context, insert "my money" and you will view Entitlement programs in a completely different light. Example: "With this Bill, Government will insure 47 million people. " Now say: My money will pay for the insurance of 47 million people that I don't know. Doesn't sound as powerful, but is equally true. And there was no mention of the President's race,

jb

Thou Shall Not Bear False Witness

Is this President kidding? He is quoting the Bible in front of religious leaders! Didn't he say that the ignorant (emphasis is mine) people just cling to their guns and religion? How can he say that if you disagree with his health care plan, all you can do is lie? What has he said? What I want is leadership. Fine he and I disagree on weather government can run health care for everyone. But what is the counter argument? I want Barack to come out and say "that the plan I want is A...B...C...D. "But he can't. What he wants is what 88% of Americans do not want and that is a single payer system. And for all of you who do not understand what that means I will spell it out for you. It is one entity paying for all health care. AKA the Government. AKA You, with higher taxes. Now I know that some receive money from the government and it is no burden to you, but I pay 36% of my income to the government. It is my highest debtor including my health insurance, car payments...well all other bills combined. Put and end to this monopoly! Single payer leads to rationing...fact. Single payer leads to higher taxes...fact. Single payer is more government dictating in your life...fact. Where are the lies? Death Panels...the whole bill is a death panel. I am not bearing false witness here, I believe this. The fact is that competition leads to better service and better products. The example is the computer. Years ago the computer used to take up entire rooms of the office building and were VERY expensive. Now you can put them in your lap and sip a non-fat, half-whip-mocha-green tea-frappacino while search out the next corporation to hate. This is insanity. I know....Iknow....we all have the right to not go broke if we get sick. What about cars, groceries, homes. Wait they already tried the latter and look where we are now. I want leadership, not rhetoric, the campaign season is over and it is time to lead. But this administration can't because they have TO SELL us the policies because they have ALL failed in the past. Please if you call yourself a Progressive can you please progress past the 1940's. FDR is dead and Keynesian economics have never worked. Hope vs Fear please I do not fear what I have already seen does not work. I'll end with question: Name ONE government program that has not gone into debt, lowered prices and been more efficient? Just one.

Ed Shultz Is Dumber Than Stephen Hawking

At least that statement is true. Fat Ed is irrelevant. What he is saying that anyone that speaks up at these town hall meetings is stupid. But, Ed, we didn't go for this health care reform in 1992 and we are not going for it again in 2009. When are the Dems going to learn that just because you win 28 states, it doesn't give you carte blanche on law making. WE DON'T WANT A GOVERNMENT HEALTH CARE TAKEOVER. America hasn't wanted it for almost 100 years.
Keep speaking out at these town halls, keep e-mailing your Senators, and Reps. Just keep speaking out!. I also want the Reps and Senators to keep talking. What they are displaying is a disdain for YOU, the American people. You know the ones they are PAID to represent. They sound like elite idiots that are saying"you don't know what you want, but I do." How is that representation? Say it out loud: "The same government that bankrupted Medicare, Social Security, can't run the Post Office, DOT, FEMA, is going to run your health care."
If it is about insuring the uninsurable and lowering the costs, then why is the public option off the table upsetting so many libs...I mean Democrats? Because they want to control YOU. Think about and get back to me.

jb

Did the President Just Tell Me to Shut Up

This is incredible. "I don't want the people who started this mess to do a whole lot of talking." That is great because the people who started this mess are dead. Lyndon B. Johnson and Harry S. Truman. We could argue about the expansion and the fraud, but it does not go to the quote. It is on record that the two previously mentioned people "started it". I have a question: How do you clean up the mess by forcing insurance companies to deny no one and put a cap on premiums? If I know my free-market principles, that will cause coverage costs to go up. Say it out loud: Expanding coverage will improve the market place and cost less. But I guess I am un-patriotic and full of dis-information.
You know like on page 124 of THE BILL -No company can sue the government over price fixing. Page 145-Employers MUST automatically enroll employees in public options. Page 127 Government will tell Doctors what they can make. Page 146-Employer must pay for health care for part-time employees. And my favorite one on page 167-Anybody that doesn't have acceptable health care will be taxed 2 1/2% of income.
Does that mean if we don't have health care that pays for abortions? Who decides what is acceptable? Is there going to be an Acceptable Czar. I know...I know...I don't understand the legislative process or language. So it is unacceptable for Credit Card companies to have wordy and hard to understand agreements, but not the Federal Government . But don't worry Obama is prepared for this kind of attack.
"When they say this bill is not about affordable health care, tell them yes it is." When they ask if this is going to cut Medicare benefits, tell them no it isn't. That's it. That is your defense, just counter all the arguments with sophomoric responses. I haven't seen a defense this weak since "My dad can beat up your dad". If this Health care bill is about insuring the people that don't have Health care why all these stipulations in the bill. He says the stars are aligned. If by stars he means Special interest groups, he may be right. The AARP, Pharmaceutical Companies, SEIU, and the AMA all want it. Why, I don't know.
The fact is that 80% of Americans don't want this reform whatever you are calling it at the time of this post and last I checked this is a representative republic. I'll say it: Mr. Obama this is about what you want. And if you impose your wants on the people that is not a representative republic that is dictatorship. What you are hearing is not some organized right-wing , misinformed, hate-mongering, mob. What you are hearing is informed Americans. That are sick and tired of supporters of this tyranny act like Billy Flynn and you refuse to listen to them. How Patriotic is that?

If Only...

A lot of talk about Health care Reform...oops...I mean Health Insurance Reform these days. Let me get this out of the way: If "Health care Reform" was working, why did they change it the "Health Insurance Reform"? (see Global warming/Climate change) Edmund Burke wrote "Every reform is only a mask undercover of which a more terrible reform, which dare not name itself, advances". If only there was a system of health care that would cover people at least 65 years of age or older and it could be financed by payroll taxes. And those taxes would be paid by employees and employers alike. And if only we could supplement it by a monthly premium from a retirement plan...let's call that ...um...Social Security.

If only we could include certain disabilities like renal failure and Lou Gehrig's disease. And this plan could also include a Part B which would include doctor visits and other medical supplies for a small price. If only there was a program that would cover low income persons of all ages that was broader. To include Physician visits, In/Out patient hospital services, prescriptions, mental health care,home and community care, and transportation to these facilities. And if there is any shortcomings, or problems with these programs, we could pass legislation, let' s call it a Stimulus Package worth $780 Billion and instead of changing light bulbs, funding ACORN, and paying back special interests(Unions) it would be used to address these problems.

If only we could find the money to expand these programs instead of having money for tunnels for turtles, covered bicycle garages, private planes and helicopters, jungle gyms. And instead of increasing the taxes for the Hardworking Americans we could find a way to maintain the funding by collecting funds. Maybe through payroll deductions, and if not enough was deducted we could establish a day...let's arbitrarily pick April 15...in which we could collect the rest of the funds. If we really want to cover this fraudulent 47 million (See Liberty and Tyranny by Mark Levin) we should enact such a program.

Oh wait it already exists it is called Medicare and Medicaid. This bill is NOT about covering 1 out of 55 that don't have Health care. This is about a tax increase on every American. This about controlling one of things that you have left in this country, the freedom to seek the best health care in the world. Linda Douglas is right there is a lot of dis-information out there and it is coming from the leadership of the Democrat party. They are selling a free lunch that doesn't exist. There is not 47 million uninsured Americans, this is NOT the 39Th best health care in the world, Insurance companies are not the reason for the rising health care cost (innovation is). Have you benefited from the gamma knife, cancer treatments, brain scans, MRI, X-Rays, Viagra?

Say it out loud:the same people that I call idiots, only care about being re-elected, morons, people who don't represent me, stupid bureaucrats, neo-cons, liberal fascists (recent poll) will do a better job with my health care decisions than I will. How does that sound? Stop spending our money in stupid places on stupid people if you really care about the fraudulent 47 million people without health care.



Please feel free to e-mail this post the White house.



jb